LICENSING &CERTIFICATION
Why appropriateness and suitability are separate tests
  1. 1. Know-your-client (KYC) & Suitability
  2. Calculators and Scratch Paper
  3. The Relationship the Rules Describe
  4. Clients Who Live Somewhere Else
  5. What KYC Has to Cover
  6. Tolerance, Capacity and Need
  7. Business Structures and Why They Change the Answer
  8. Writing It Down, and Having the Client Confirm It
  9. The Trusted Contact Person, and the Temporary Hold
  10. Who Owns KYC, and How Current It Has to Be
  11. What the Client File Holds
  12. Account Appropriateness
  13. The Account Types You Have to Compare
  14. What the Account-opening File Needs
  15. The Relationship Disclosure Document
  16. Keeping Confidential Information Contained
  17. The Welcome Package
  18. Product Due Diligence and Knowing the Product
  19. The Suitability Determination
  20. Unsolicited and Unsuitable Instructions
  21. Investment Actions
  22. Why Appropriateness and Suitability Are Separate Tests
  23. Monitoring, Triggering Events and Change
  24. Conflicts of Interest
  25. Outside Activities
  26. Personal Financial Dealings with Clients
  27. Standards of Conduct
  28. A Client, Worked End to End
  29. Twelve Ways to Lose Marks on This Element
  30. Fifteen Terms to Own
  31. One Item From CIRO's Practice Exam

Retail Securities • Chapter 1

Know-Your-Client (KYC) & suitability

Why appropriateness and suitability are separate tests

This is graded at analyze, which means the exam wants a reason, not a definition.

The two duties exist at different moments and answer different questions. Appropriateness is the narrower check: can this account type and this general kind of activity serve this client at all. It is the check available where a full does not apply, such as a self directed account in which the dealer gives no advice. Suitability is the comprehensive check on a specific action, and it requires the full KYC picture.

The practical difference is what you do when the answer is no.

If the account is inappropriate, the remedy is the account: change the type, remove the feature, or decline to open it. If the action is unsuitable, the remedy is the action: advise against it, offer an alternative, document the client's instruction if they insist.

A weak answer collapses them into one idea, usually by saying appropriateness is suitability applied to accounts. That sounds tidy and loses the reason the two tests exist: one protects the client from a container they cannot use, the other protects them from a decision they should not make.

Disclaimer

Examination requirements, content, structure, weighting, passing requirements and other details may change from time to time. We make every reasonable effort to keep our materials current and aligned with the information published by the relevant examination authority.

The information and practice questions provided by Compleat reflect our best understanding of the applicable examination requirements. They are intended for preparation purposes only and should not be considered a guarantee of the content, format, questions or outcome of any examination.

Candidates should always refer to the relevant examination authority for the most current official requirements and examination information.

Examination names and designations referred to on this site belong to their owners, including the Canadian Securities Institute, the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization, FP Canada, CFA Institute and CALU. They are named here to describe the examinations our material prepares you for. Compleat is an independent study aid. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or licensed by any of them, and we claim no rights in their marks.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

Compleat Exams. Learn Smarter.